# 800 x 600 vs 1024 x 768? Discuss!

**URL:** <https://forum.kirupa.com/t/800-x-600-vs-1024-x-768-discuss/145175>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [April 20, 2005, 3:22pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/800-x-600-vs-1024-x-768-discuss/145175 "2005-04-20T15:22:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![freeeky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/41988e/32.png) [@freeeky](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/freeeky)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2005, 3:22pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/800-x-600-vs-1024-x-768-discuss/145175/1 "2005-04-20T15:22:39Z")

</div>

800 x 600 vs 1024 x 768? Discuss!

We are currently in the process of revamping a sports portal we currently develop.

We are looking to increase content and advertising space, and have seen that many of our competitors have adapted to a larger layout based on resolutions of 1024 x 768.

I have always developed for browsers using smaller resolutions, but am warming to the fact that many have now adapted to the larger resolution monitors now.

I am looking to develop the site, with our own content being displayed in the 800 x 600 area, with adverts from third parties being paced outside this area, but still within the 1024 x 768 area.

Have any of you adapted to the larger size? reasons for and against?

Does anyone have any evidence of users using the larger resolutions?

I have found this, but unsure of how reliable it is.

[http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers\_stats.asp](http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp)

Please discuss and give me your feedback, it would be appreciated!

Thanks
