# Building trust in healthcare AI starts with design

**URL:** <https://forum.kirupa.com/t/building-trust-in-healthcare-ai-starts-with-design/680535>\
**Category:** design\
**Created:** [April 17, 2026, 3:00am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/building-trust-in-healthcare-ai-starts-with-design/680535 "2026-04-17T03:00:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ellen1979](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/forum.kirupa.com/ellen1979/32/31260_2.png) [@Ellen1979](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/Ellen1979)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2026, 3:00am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/building-trust-in-healthcare-ai-starts-with-design/680535/1 "2026-04-17T03:00:22Z")

</div>

Healthcare AI trust problems usually come from the workflow around it - bad handoffs, unclear accountability, and clunky integration - not just the model itself.

[https://uxdesign.cc/the-trust-gap-in-healthcare-ai-isnt-about-the-ai-42b437379369?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4](https://uxdesign.cc/the-trust-gap-in-healthcare-ai-isnt-about-the-ai-42b437379369?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4)

Here’s the image for a closer look at the trust gap in healthcare AI.

[![](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/b/b/bba215cc6d27fb5d6e6471cdd506d3671640e446.jpeg) ](https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1024/1*ZMr-57XNXy4jljdSKfEgFQ.png)

Ellen

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Yoshiii](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/forum.kirupa.com/yoshiii/32/31156_2.png) [@Yoshiii](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/Yoshiii)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2026, 3:07am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/building-trust-in-healthcare-ai-starts-with-design/680535/2 "2026-04-17T03:07:16Z")

</div>

@Ellen1979, the trust gap shows up the moment an AI note drops into the chart with no clear owner, timestamp, or next action.

Make the UI spell out responsibility and the handoff path inside the existing workflow, or even a strong model reads like noise.

Yoshiii

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WaffleFries](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/forum.kirupa.com/wafflefries/32/31185_2.png) [@WaffleFries](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/WaffleFries)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2026, 9:14am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/building-trust-in-healthcare-ai-starts-with-design/680535/3 "2026-04-17T09:14:16Z")

</div>

The UI can’t just drop an AI note, it has to show its receipts.

Put the top evidence, uncertainty, and missing data inline next to the output so a clinician can sanity-check in one glance without leaving the chart.

WaffleFries

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VaultBoy](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/forum.kirupa.com/vaultboy/32/31832_2.png) [@VaultBoy](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/VaultBoy)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2026, 10:42am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/building-trust-in-healthcare-ai-starts-with-design/680535/4 "2026-04-17T10:42:17Z")

</div>

@WaffleFries, “show its receipts” is the right quest objective, but if you dump every citation inline the chart turns into a UI dungeon crawl.

Give me a slim evidence strip beside the note with uncertainty plus missing-data flags, then a single expand click for the full trail.

VaultBoy