# Comment/Critique: Abstract Signature

**URL:** <https://forum.kirupa.com/t/comment-critique-abstract-signature/54596>\
**Category:** design\
**Created:** [June 16, 2004, 12:33am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/comment-critique-abstract-signature/54596 "2004-06-16T00:33:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elios](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/2acd7d/32.png) [@Elios](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/Elios)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2004, 12:33am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/comment-critique-abstract-signature/54596/1 "2004-06-16T00:33:15Z")

</div>

Okay, so I came up with this background from a series of 3d renders I did: [low quality background](http://s94657477.onlinehome.us/showOff/3dabstract_trendwhore.jpg). Anyway, from that I came up with two sigs, and was wondering which one looks better.

Sig 1 (no grunge/brushes in the background):  
 ![](http://forum.kirupa.com/uploads/kirupa/606/d8620af268da7711.jpg)

Sig 2:  
 ![](http://forum.kirupa.com/uploads/kirupa/607/de28daaadca80f94.jpg)

Please be honest. :}

Later,  
–elios