# CPU demands made by flash

**URL:** https://forum.kirupa.com/t/cpu-demands-made-by-flash/109449
**Category:** Uncategorized
**Created:** [May 5, 2004, 5:01pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/cpu-demands-made-by-flash/109449 "2004-05-05T17:01:56Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Liquideye](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/aeb1de/32.png) [@Liquideye](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/Liquideye)
#### Post date: [May 5, 2004, 5:01pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/cpu-demands-made-by-flash/109449/1 "2004-05-05T17:01:56Z")

</div>

Hey there,

The new company site is done, more or less, having already missed the may1reboot we are struggling to get things ready quickly.

One of the main problems was I found the site to be very heavy on the cpu. The site is at 60fps. Which to me is just common practice. The site runs perfectly when i run it locally (on my computer in swf previews) however when i preview it in the browser, it runs significantly slower than it should.

I found myself trying to correct it by “upping” the fps to 95 to make it run like it should on my computer. I hear you saying 95fps is rediculous, which it is, BUT it the fps doesnt reflect the way the movie plays in the browser.

I have never before had this problem with flash online before. Has anyone else come accross this problem, of having a slower frame rate once viewed in browser, even if the move is properly preloaded?

Any help appreciated.

p.s i am reluctant to post the test site as the company hasnt officially launched yet (the transition from freelance, to Ltd) and the site isnt 100% complete.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/6/2/621e5c11736f46532526e61be85940af4230f3e5.png) [@system](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 5, 2004, 5:13pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/cpu-demands-made-by-flash/109449/2 "2004-05-05T17:13:54Z")

</div>

60fps! That is ridiculous in my opinion. I never do anything over 35fps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/6/2/621e5c11736f46532526e61be85940af4230f3e5.png) [@system](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 5, 2004, 5:20pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/cpu-demands-made-by-flash/109449/3 "2004-05-05T17:20:39Z")

</div>

well yup imagine you have a loop that loops 30 times for each onEnterFrame, at 60fps it has to do 1800 times your action - which is imo ridiculous… Try lower frame rate anywhere between 24 fps and 35 fps - and check if there aren’t too many loops/ or massive onEnterframe functions

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/6/2/621e5c11736f46532526e61be85940af4230f3e5.png) [@system](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 5, 2004, 5:21pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/cpu-demands-made-by-flash/109449/4 "2004-05-05T17:21:40Z")

</div>

Each to their own my friend.

So any help with why it should run slower un browser?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/6/2/621e5c11736f46532526e61be85940af4230f3e5.png) [@system](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/system)
#### Post date: [May 5, 2004, 5:23pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/cpu-demands-made-by-flash/109449/5 "2004-05-05T17:23:01Z")

</div>

i have nothing like that mlk, just a plain load of tweens.

[http://www.silva-kush.co.uk/r4](http://www.silva-kush.co.uk/r4)

hosted on a friend server while mine is down for maintenence.

How does it run then?
