# Dynamic sliding viewer vs infinite resize issue

**URL:** <https://forum.kirupa.com/t/dynamic-sliding-viewer-vs-infinite-resize-issue/214934>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [February 2, 2007, 3:44am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/dynamic-sliding-viewer-vs-infinite-resize-issue/214934 "2007-02-02T03:44:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gorilla1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/278dde/32.png) [@gorilla1](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/gorilla1)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2007, 3:44am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/dynamic-sliding-viewer-vs-infinite-resize-issue/214934/1 "2007-02-02T03:44:27Z")

</div>

At this url:  
[http://flash-creations.com/notes/dynamic\_slidingviewer.php](http://flash-creations.com/notes/dynamic_slidingviewer.php)  
is a script that creates a slideviewer for any number of images. It has a nice, basic thumbnail scroller. However, notice that when the mouse is over the thumbnails, there is a jittery movement within the thumbnilas – this becomes much more pronounced if you use a larger thumbnail… Scotty’s infinite\_resize viewer (see url below) does not have this jittery quality. Why does the one above have this problem? I would prefer to use it over infinite\_resize because it draws out the movieclips with actionscript and so is more flexibile.

> **[Scotty's Image Resize Gallery](https://www.kirupa.com/forum/showthread.php?t=87388)**
>
> Got a web design/development question or just want to hang out with the most awesome people on the planet? Drop on in!

  
(Look for the infinite\_resize.zip)

G