# Flash site bad form?

**URL:** <https://forum.kirupa.com/t/flash-site-bad-form/233565>\
**Category:** flash\
**Created:** [July 25, 2007, 1:59am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/flash-site-bad-form/233565 "2007-07-25T01:59:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JoshuaR](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/a88e57/32.png) [@JoshuaR](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/JoshuaR)\
**Post date:** [July 25, 2007, 1:59am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/flash-site-bad-form/233565/1 "2007-07-25T01:59:53Z")

</div>

Hi Guys,  
I was just wondering if I could get some opinions. In the past it’s been considered bad form to have a site built entirely on Flash, and not have a corresponding html version (or the like).

I’ve noticed that lately a lot of major companies, like [Nike](http://www.nike.com) for example, have sites totally dependent on Flash (obviously these sites check for Flash player and instruct the user what to do if they don’t have it). So I was curious whether the general consensus is still the same, or is it ok to have a site exclusively Flash?

🙂