# Image dimensions limit

**URL:** <https://forum.kirupa.com/t/image-dimensions-limit/160968>\
**Category:** flash\
**Created:** [August 31, 2005, 12:43am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/image-dimensions-limit/160968 "2005-08-31T00:43:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FSan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ce7236/32.png) [@FSan](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/FSan)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2005, 12:43am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/image-dimensions-limit/160968/1 "2005-08-31T00:43:19Z")

</div>

I recently wrote a small script to display an endless scroll for 360 degree images. The image is loaded dinamically so I can use it as a viewer for all the 360 degree images in the site’s gallery.

It works fine, but I found one image that appears truncated even though everything else works as expected.

I found this  
[http://director-online.com/buildArticle.php?id=170](http://director-online.com/buildArticle.php?id=170)  
that says: \*The maximum image size of a Flash 2 movie is 2880 x 2880 pixels

\*The image that is giving me this problem is larger than that and it seems to be cut at 2880px widht.

Can anyone confirm this?  
And if so, is there any way to override it since I’m using pure as?

Despite the years working with flash, I keep finding these nasty surprises.

Last time I learned about the 16,000 frame limit when working on a cd presentation…

I wonder what’s next.

Regards