# Multiple layout(s) critique **URL:** \ **Category:** Uncategorized\ **Created:** [October 22, 2006, 5:22pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/multiple-layout-s-critique/204697 "2006-10-22T17:22:42Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 11\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![aldomatic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ee7513/32.png) [@aldomatic](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/aldomatic)\ **Post date:** [October 22, 2006, 5:22pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/multiple-layout-s-critique/204697/1 "2006-10-22T17:22:42Z")
i have 4 layouts… the company wants a corporate look. thier logo has those colors that are mostly used through out the mock-ups like blue and light yellow. the site will be in CSS. would like to know what you guys/gals think and pick one and why or what could be added… thanks 🙂 [Layout 1](http://aldomatic.com/jpgs/screenshots/Lay1.jpg) [Layout 2](http://aldomatic.com/jpgs/screenshots/Lay2.jpg) [Layout 3](http://aldomatic.com/jpgs/screenshots/Lay3.jpg) [Layout4](http://aldomatic.com/jpgs/screenshots/Lay4.jpg) -al ---
**Author:** ![acc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b38774/32.png) [@acc](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/acc)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2006, 4:05pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/multiple-layout-s-critique/204697/2 "2006-10-23T16:05:53Z")
my vote goes for layout 2 ---
**Author:** ![kmria](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/forum.kirupa.com/kmria/32/2248_2.png) [@kmria](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/kmria)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2006, 4:44pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/multiple-layout-s-critique/204697/3 "2006-10-23T16:44:52Z")
I like 3rd one. how you done logo off the board is nice. It’s simple well done. ---
**Author:** ![crazy69bug](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f14d63/32.png) [@crazy69bug](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/crazy69bug)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2006, 5:05pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/multiple-layout-s-critique/204697/4 "2006-10-23T17:05:14Z")
Between 3 and 4 ---
**Author:** ![kenshin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/8e8cbc/32.png) [@kenshin](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/kenshin)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2006, 5:45pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/multiple-layout-s-critique/204697/5 "2006-10-23T17:45:22Z")
Number 2. Lol looks like you might have to choose on your own, we’re all giving completely different responses. ---
**Author:** ![DDD](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9fc348/32.png) [@DDD](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/DDD)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2006, 6:05pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/multiple-layout-s-critique/204697/6 "2006-10-23T18:05:18Z")
Id have to go four. But I agree that they are all kinda run of the mill. It is hard to get out of that blog look tho. But they are professional looking ---
**Author:** ![DDD](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9fc348/32.png) [@DDD](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/DDD)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2006, 6:08pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/multiple-layout-s-critique/204697/7 "2006-10-23T18:08:05Z")
Id have to go four. But I agree that they are all kinda run of the mill. It is hard to get out of that blog look tho. But they are professional looking. ---
**Author:** ![REEF](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ce73a5/32.png) [@REEF](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/REEF)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2006, 6:08pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/multiple-layout-s-critique/204697/8 "2006-10-23T18:08:31Z")
Can anyone elaborate what “professional looking” means? ---
**Author:** ![DDD](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9fc348/32.png) [@DDD](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/DDD)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2006, 6:17pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/multiple-layout-s-critique/204697/9 "2006-10-23T18:17:04Z")
well for me professional means, they took it to a professional. Someone who understands the grid, color theory and design in general. Hence the word professional. ---
**Author:** ![REEF](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ce73a5/32.png) [@REEF](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/REEF)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2006, 6:22pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/multiple-layout-s-critique/204697/10 "2006-10-23T18:22:34Z")
Ooh makes sense :). ---
**Author:** ![fasterthanlight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ecc23a/32.png) [@fasterthanlight](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/fasterthanlight)\ **Post date:** [October 23, 2006, 6:43pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/multiple-layout-s-critique/204697/11 "2006-10-23T18:43:05Z")
“professional” == not noob :thumb: When I classify something as professional, it usually has a good, unified colour scheme. None of this “I’ll just make it this completely other colour because I don’t want to put too much thought into it” predefined-settings-in-the-layer-styles-panel-not-used-in-photoshop (_shudders at thought of horrible bevels_) every single small detail is thought about and tended too doesn’t look too much like a template some concept of orginality more than a day spend in the design aspect of the development …among other, smaller things