# One last logo critique

**URL:** <https://forum.kirupa.com/t/one-last-logo-critique/213253>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [January 18, 2007, 3:44am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/one-last-logo-critique/213253 "2007-01-18T03:44:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![acc](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b38774/32.png) [@acc](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/acc)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2007, 3:44am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/one-last-logo-critique/213253/1 "2007-01-18T03:44:22Z")

</div>

so sorry, but since I’ve decided to add the word “grafiks” into the logo, to avoid confusion since the full name is “postkard grafiks” and as I’ve mentioned there’s already a [postkard.com](http://postkard.com)

I ended up playing with the logo a little bit more.

I know I’ve posted revisions of this logo a number of times, but I do need a logo by the weekend, so this would be my final asking for critique and/or suggestions.

I do just want to mention that the stamp look really came out, as this past month, in the cards and calendars I’ve made, I ended up using the look of the stamp to label the packaging. The stamp showed, the name and what the item was, ie. calendar 2007.

I do like the stamp look, just not sure how it’ll limit or challenge the different uses of the logo in the future.

Any advice/preference/suggestions would be great!