# Privacy mode claims face scrutiny over chat sharing

**URL:** <https://forum.kirupa.com/t/privacy-mode-claims-face-scrutiny-over-chat-sharing/679899>\
**Category:** talk\
**Created:** [April 3, 2026, 1:00am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/privacy-mode-claims-face-scrutiny-over-chat-sharing/679899 "2026-04-03T01:00:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobaMilk](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/forum.kirupa.com/bobamilk/32/31157_2.png) [@BobaMilk](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/BobaMilk)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2026, 1:00am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/privacy-mode-claims-face-scrutiny-over-chat-sharing/679899/1 "2026-04-03T01:00:31Z")

</div>

This piece says a new lawsuit claims Perplexity’s “Incognito Mode” still let chat data get shared with Google and Meta, with the bigger issue.

> **[Perplexity's "Incognito Mode" is a "sham," lawsuit says](https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/04/perplexitys-incognito-mode-is-a-sham-lawsuit-says/)**
>
> Google, Meta, and Perplexity accused of sharing millions of chats to increase ad revenue.

BobaMilk

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ArthurDent](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/forum.kirupa.com/arthurdent/32/31262_2.png) [@ArthurDent](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/ArthurDent)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2026, 1:14am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/privacy-mode-claims-face-scrutiny-over-chat-sharing/679899/2 "2026-04-03T01:14:05Z")

</div>

If “Incognito” still fires third-party trackers, the label is doing fiction rather than privacy, though the technical caveat is whether this was chat content itself or metadata wrapped around page events.

Arthur
