# Qualify or not?

**URL:** <https://forum.kirupa.com/t/qualify-or-not/35845>\
**Category:** meta\
**Created:** [November 18, 2003, 8:54pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/qualify-or-not/35845 "2003-11-18T20:54:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grifter730](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/53a042/32.png) [@Grifter730](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/Grifter730)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2003, 8:54pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/qualify-or-not/35845/1 "2003-11-18T20:54:39Z")

</div>

Hi, I have read the rules, but my site is very borderline on some of these stuff, so please, moderators/judges, let me know if this site can at least qualify: [www.skycastlestudios.com](http://www.skycastlestudios.com)  
I emailed kirupa, but I figured I should post here as well just in case he doesn’t get the email.  
It is a portfolio website, which functions much like a game, but it has quick links for navigation if you don’t want to play the game. It also has an opening and ending animation, both of which you don’t need to view, depending on whether you’ve been there before or not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/6/2/621e5c11736f46532526e61be85940af4230f3e5.png) [@system](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [December 27, 2003, 4:25pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/qualify-or-not/35845/2 "2003-12-27T16:25:37Z")

</div>

Yup its back alright and its a pretty impressive site. It takes a long time to preload  
Great job with the drawings and humour.  
Really impressive!