# Site Check/Showcase

**URL:** <https://forum.kirupa.com/t/site-check-showcase/106586>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [April 7, 2004, 4:35am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/site-check-showcase/106586 "2004-04-07T04:35:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/6/2/621e5c11736f46532526e61be85940af4230f3e5.png) [@system](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 4:35am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/site-check-showcase/106586/1 "2004-04-07T04:35:59Z")

</div>

Hey everyone,  
Just wondering, should showcase and site check be combined, and site check taking Showcase’s spot on the top of the forums? Most of the sites there are critiqued anyway, and we may as well have one area for critiquing as opposed to several.

What do you all think?

Cheers!  
Kirupa 😏

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/6/2/621e5c11736f46532526e61be85940af4230f3e5.png) [@system](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 4:48am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/site-check-showcase/106586/2 "2004-04-07T04:48:02Z")

</div>

Yea, i think Showcase turned out to be another site check forum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/6/2/621e5c11736f46532526e61be85940af4230f3e5.png) [@system](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 4:59am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/site-check-showcase/106586/3 "2004-04-07T04:59:33Z")

</div>

in theory they should be diff…since site check usually is critiques and showcase should be just oohs and ahhhs…(or maybe boos)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/6/2/621e5c11736f46532526e61be85940af4230f3e5.png) [@system](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 5:51am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/site-check-showcase/106586/4 "2004-04-07T05:51:30Z")

</div>

Yeah, I see Site Check as a place where you get critiques on what to change about your site… Showcase is for finished projects you have completed and can’t or won’t exactly change, but rather just want to show.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/6/2/621e5c11736f46532526e61be85940af4230f3e5.png) [@system](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 6:04am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/site-check-showcase/106586/5 "2004-04-07T06:04:25Z")

</div>

The problem is that, even if it is for show, I did see a few unfinished sites, and people still do comment on them. If we tell people to not critique, then that forum will simply end up like the Cool Sites forum. If it is Site Check, we can check out more sites - good and bad.

😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/6/2/621e5c11736f46532526e61be85940af4230f3e5.png) [@system](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2004, 8:35am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/site-check-showcase/106586/6 "2004-04-07T08:35:38Z")

</div>

I agree with Big K and Claudio 🙂 But I prefer the term Showcase rather than Site check. It sounds more sexy 😃