# Static text (device fonts) vs. dynamic text (anti-alias non-embedded)

**URL:** https://forum.kirupa.com/t/static-text-device-fonts-vs-dynamic-text-anti-alias-non-embedded/223749
**Category:** Uncategorized
**Created:** [April 25, 2007, 1:54pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/static-text-device-fonts-vs-dynamic-text-anti-alias-non-embedded/223749 "2007-04-25T13:54:34Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sparky\_J](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/aeb1de/32.png) [@Sparky\_J](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/Sparky_J)
#### Post date: [April 25, 2007, 1:54pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/static-text-device-fonts-vs-dynamic-text-anti-alias-non-embedded/223749/1 "2007-04-25T13:54:34Z")

</div>

Any thoughts on which is better to use?

When i use static text and device fonts (arial) the text looks great. The text doesn’t change so no need to be dynamic.

Or

I use dynamic text (arial) non-embedded and it looks good too. The text doesn’t change but leaving it as dynamic makes it render better.