# When it comes down to actionscript

**URL:** <https://forum.kirupa.com/t/when-it-comes-down-to-actionscript/96932>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [December 15, 2003, 3:55pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/when-it-comes-down-to-actionscript/96932 "2003-12-15T15:55:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lacuna](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/edb3f5/32.png) [@Lacuna](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/Lacuna)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 3:55pm UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/when-it-comes-down-to-actionscript/96932/1 "2003-12-15T15:55:23Z")

</div>

If I were to fully create my site with only actionscript and no motion tweens whatsoever, would that itself dramatically drop the file size? Or does the amount of coding then kick in and affect the speed that the processor can read it?

– feeling ambitious… :c)

~~ Seretha :love:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/uploads/kirupa/original/3X/6/2/621e5c11736f46532526e61be85940af4230f3e5.png) [@system](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2003, 6:33am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/when-it-comes-down-to-actionscript/96932/2 "2003-12-16T06:33:31Z")

</div>

Quite true! Thanks for the clarification! :thumb: