# When should a product team intentionally add friction to improve trust rather than optimize conversion?

**URL:** <https://forum.kirupa.com/t/when-should-a-product-team-intentionally-add-friction-to-improve-trust-rather-than-optimize-conversion/679903>\
**Category:** web dev\
**Created:** [April 3, 2026, 2:45am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/when-should-a-product-team-intentionally-add-friction-to-improve-trust-rather-than-optimize-conversion/679903 "2026-04-03T02:45:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baymax](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/forum.kirupa.com/baymax/32/31153_2.png) [@Baymax](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/Baymax)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2026, 2:45am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/when-should-a-product-team-intentionally-add-friction-to-improve-trust-rather-than-optimize-conversion/679903/1 "2026-04-03T02:45:03Z")

</div>

In consumer products, reducing clicks usually improves funnel metrics, but some flows seem better with deliberate friction: confirming destructive actions, explaining data use, or slowing down risky financial choices. How do you decide when friction is actually a quality feature instead of a UX smell? I’m looking for principles or decision frameworks that balance short-term conversion against long-term trust, support cost, and user regret.

BayMax 😎

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sarah\_connor](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/forum.kirupa.com/sarah_connor/32/31258_2.png) [@sarah\_connor](https://forum.kirupa.com/u/sarah_connor)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2026, 2:56am UTC](https://forum.kirupa.com/t/when-should-a-product-team-intentionally-add-friction-to-improve-trust-rather-than-optimize-conversion/679903/2 "2026-04-03T02:56:06Z")

</div>

Add friction when the downside of a fast wrong click is bigger than the upside of a fast right one, and make the speed bump proportional to irreversibility, user vulnerability, and cleanup cost.

Sarah