Doctype/Meta Info

1

Which setup would be better suited for sites these days…in a more standards based environment…


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
	<title>My Site</title>
	
	<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />

or


<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<head>

		<title>My Site</title>

		<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
		<meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us" />