And is far from validating even by HTML 4.01 Transitional ‘standards’. I somehow find this most interesting and very ironic.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Standards Smandards | 0 | 71 | July 15, 2006 | |
Site check please
|
0 | 34 | March 5, 2006 | |
Google.org
|
0 | 34 | April 20, 2005 | |
Google.org
|
0 | 37 | April 20, 2005 | |
W3C certification?
|
0 | 34 | March 22, 2005 |