Haha, good point, it does work though david. That is what I have been meaning to ask you but forgot.
I know it is written as Math.random()*3 (and that is how I always write it), but why is Math.random(3) considered improper syntax when it works perfectly fine?
Ah yes, after re-experimenting with it while using the trace function, I found it only returns 1’s and 0’s if you have it has Math.random(3)… makes me wonder what I did different when I first tested it…eh oh well, I still know I do it right now.
And Lost, I’ve just noticed you have more posts than Upu himself! Now correct me if I’m wrong, Upu, but I don’t think this has ever happened to you, has it? Even on the old forums?
Yes this is true. Our little upstart Lostinbeta has surpassed even my long windedness. Pretty impressive. It probebly happened because I’ve been spending a lot more time working and less socializing over the last two months. I still have so much to do. I get into Flash slumps (as we all do) which last a month or so… when that happens I do a lot more posting than work. Who knows maybe I can blow him out in October. (I tend to think not though… he’s a great asset and one of the reasons I feel I can take the time to work instead of post. thanks again for that beta)
[SIZE=1]I don’t know![/SIZE] But you could, for instance, write a tutorial about an effect you really like. I kinda did that with the perspective thing, even though I can’t get it finished… :*(
Here’s your mission, Pseudo-King: [SIZE=3]amaze us![/SIZE]