Are humans losing language’s logic? While we keep striving to understand how anything works, we are beginning to think that we may actually understand things. At the same time we make the point that our language can supercede whatever our science may interpret. The ideas that come from the mind are often something that can now be understood and yet we seem to concern ourselves with only what we can prove. Is it possible that as civilization becomes more advanced that humans do not try to understand what is inside themselves, but they focus upon what happens outside of the personage of a person.
People have lost the will to communicate with eachother. American society and the idea of bussiness being of the greatest importance seems to be spreading. The dinner conversation now is about how much was accomplished in a day not upon what a person may think of how the world is going in this time. While the focus upon bussiness is bringing about great accomplishments in the world, it is also destroying human nature. Humans are social creatures and need to communicate so that we may work together better, and with the new emphasis on accomplishments rather than social ideas people are losing the ability to communicate properly.
Language is the basis of how we are able to communicate, and it is by many standards one of the greatest accomplishments of man kind. In the past language was meant to convey what one thought, and it did so by representation. In contemporary terms with freudian ideas it seems that all interpretation becomes thought. This idea I believe to be untrue because the people who try to use symbolism in such a manner then use language which is symbolism to create thier ideas. This idea is preposterous considerind that a person may use symbolism to explain symbolism, while symbolism is an interpretation of how a person thinks.
Psychology is best example of how humans are becoming arrogant and losing the idea of explanation. Instead of using language to explain things the idea of psychology is to place language upon a person. This act of labelling is not morally wrong but in its nature it is factually wrong. Since each individual is unable to perfectly view anothers thoughts an idea of being able to place your thoughts on a higher level than someone else is completely wrong.
