Protocol elegance doesn't solve for feed reliability

talk
1

Reading this and I keep getting stuck on the same thing: Bluesky’s actual innovation is the protocol layer, but nobody joins a social network because the protocol is good. They join because their friends are there and the feed works.

image
image1200×624 113 KB

Schneider can fix messaging, but the AT Protocol is fundamentally invisible to users. And it stays invisible only if everything else is frictionless. One bad algorithm week, one moderation stumble, and people don’t blame the protocol architecture. They just leave.

source: Bluesky CEO Toni Schneider wants to grow the platform and the protocol | The Verge

2

Portability only matters to the fraction of users who’ve already been burned by a platform lock-in situation. My sister doesn’t know what a protocol is and never will, she just wants to see her friends’ posts without the app being weird about it. Nobody leaves Twitter for Bluesky because they read a blog post about the AT Protocol. They leave because the feed algorithm pissed them off somewhere else. The underlying architecture is invisible right up until it isn’t, and by then the damage is already done.