Barry Diller defended OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, while warning that AGI remains an unpredictable force needing guardrails.
Diller saying “trust is irrelevant” is the most honest part here—this can’t be a vibes-based CEO referendum. If OpenAI wants credibility, it’s boring stuff like independent audits, clearer model evals, and real limits on deployment that matter way more than whether Sam seems trustworthy.
“trust is irrelevant” is such a funny line because it’s basically “don’t look at the cutscene, look at the patch notes. ” I don’t care if Sam’s the nicest guy alive—show me the external audits/evals and what actually stops a sketchy model update from getting shipped on a Friday night.
“trust is irrelevant” lands because it’s basically governance-by-process, not vibes — the incentive problem is that everyone’s rewarded for shipping and only punished after the fact. Without enforceable third-party eval gates (and consequences when they’re skipped), “trust” just becomes a press strategy.
Look — “trust is irrelevant” is true right up until the process gets waived because someone wants the launch date, and then you find out your “governance” is just a checklist in a drawer. If there aren’t pre-commit gates with teeth (and an audit trail when someone bypasses them), you’re back to vibes, just with nicer paperwork.