[size=4][color=Red]OFFTOPIC[/color][/size]
my other suggestion is to offer more funding for students to attend medical school (ie scholarships and federal loans [which carry a lower interest rate than bank loans]).
[color=Gray]I don’t know about the US but that would make no difference here in Australia. Everyone can get a HECS debt. 1% government interest loan to pay for all UNI fees.
You only ever have to start making repayments on it if you earn over $30,000.
Of course if you are wealthy you stay wealthy, paying as you go gives you 25% discount on your fees.[/color][color=Gray]
So the rich that can afford it, it cost them 25% less to get a degree.
The problem is not that there aren’t enough students who want to do it, or don’t have financial access to it. They just limit the numbers, so even if you get 100%. You may not get accepted because of the limited intake.[/color][color=Gray]
[/color]
it isn’t because the campus is beautiful or the people are nice. they go because the education will make them more polished and ready for the professional world than at other institutions.
[color=Gray]I thought it was just for the name…. I don’t know about the US but UNI’s are basically all the same here. We have some that people consider to have more stature, because they have been around longer and still have sandstone buildings. But if you do a degree in computer science, it doesn’t matter which UNI you go to you are going to learn the same thing at the same level.[/color]
it’s one thing to assume a level of education based on what institution someone attends, it’s a completely different thing to assume something about someone’s personality or background.
[color=Gray]You have to be kidding right…. While some students may not come from a wealthy background, and some may be there on scholarships. I will bet you my left nut if I go stand outside Harvard and look at the cars people turn up in. Then go to some other University and compare them. While I have not done this, I guaranty that there will be more BMW/MERCS/PORSHES at Harvard.[/color][color=Gray]
So I see nothing wrong with my claim that Harvard has more students from a wealthy background than others.
And I think it is generally accepted that quite a few children who come from a wealthy background are stuck up arrogant and spoilt.
So since there are more wealthy students there, it is only logical to assume that there are more stuck up arrogant students there than else where.[/color] [color=Gray]** [color=Lime]**********************[/color]
[/color]
[color=Gray]I think MIT doesn’t have a reputation because of the education you receive; it has one because of the student’s that go there.
Even if you are a God at programming, and know as much as your professors, you still have to do the same old boring programming 101.
[/color]
[color=Gray]But come time for Honors/PHD, because you are so advanced, your honors/PHD projects are far more advanced than others.
[/color]
[color=Gray]And because the work that comes out of there is so high, it attracts more of the high achievers.
[/color]
[color=Gray]If I took someone who scraped through programming at community college and sent them to MIT, they are still going to come out an average programmer; they are not going to come out Bill Gates.
The high achievers that come out of MIT, were high achievers before they ever got there.
Take the K-man… He has this site, written books…. This before he ever went to MIT.
MIT didn’t make him, he makes MIT what it is along with the other high achievers that go there.[/color]
Well I am really board with this topic now…