What proof do you have copper? It wouldn’t be too hard for them to construct a movie set that looks like the moon and film a movie of some guy in a space suit jumping around. It wouldn’t be hard to take a picture of the earth and just make it smaller. Plus the gov’t had the incentive. They had to get on the moon by the end of the 60’s, and they wanted to beat the russians. So why not just fake it and make the world think you accomplished that?
Sorry, just got through watching wag the dog. I’m a little consipiracy happy right now. Great movie btw, you should all watch it. De niro acts just like some people from this site :). Take a guess who :P.
I’m buying Nali’s theory too. I checked my 1976 world book encyclopedia after I saw that show and the crop marks in the foto of the astronauts and the space craft fell BEHIND some areas instead of projecting IN FRONT of everything in the field of vision of the lens. All their comments about shadows or lack there of in that same photo also smack of poor staging .
I know men have walked on the moon, but I don’t think it happened when they say it did.
My history teacher in high school was convinced it was faked. He used to tell us all the time.
P.S. Where I lived in Hawaii, you could drive to a side of the island that looks just like the moon. Literally. It’s miles of fresh rock from the volcano. Just black rock and craters. … would have been a great filming location.
I don’t think it was faked at all! I think neil did land on the moon and bounce around, and the people who came up with “ITS FAKE!” obviouly didn’t know (or were forgetting) physics, and how they would apply to the moon. The discovery channel said so!
