And like i said, all of it can be done with normal, non-GM food… (but it is less profitable, and therefore not considered as an option)
Feeding starving people - im all for that… but using GM food to feed starving populations is shady, especially when GM companies are capitalizing on the fact that the starving nations dont have the luxury to care about whether or not the food they are given is GM or organic (beggers cant be choosers). They just want to eat… GM producers know this, and so they continue to push their designer crops, which would otherwise be a hardsell to well-fed and well-informed populations…
Hey, that article you shared the link to is really good… I agree with the president of zambia when he says, “There’s no justification for feeding people ‘poison’.”
it also goes on to say this:
Many Southern African nations have expressed deep concerns that GM food aid could be used to grow new crops and so enter the local food chain.
This could jeopardise exports to Europe, where GM food is less common than in the United States.
Several countries affected by the crisis have refused to accept unmilled GM maize but have agreed to accept ground meal.
US officials deny that there is any risk[COLOR=DarkRed]*[/COLOR] involved with GM food and point out that it is eaten every day by millions of Americans.
[COLOR=DarkRed]*mindfully.org note:
Since US officials deny there’s a risk, it means there is a risk.
It’s only logical, considering the record of such people in our regulatory agencies. It is abundantly clear that they represent the GM food industry of the US, not the people of the US. And it seems to us that the president of Zambia is a very wise man to refuse the trash that is fed to the people of the US by the transnational agribusiness.
What isn’t so clear is why the people of the US continue to eat it without reservation. They continue to follow like sheep going to slaughter.[/COLOR]
I do agree with you though, on this point. “finding non-GM food aid would be very difficult and time-consuming.”