Hey you guys-\r I have set up my site and it didn’t work in Netscrape. I was so upset about this fact that I did absolutely nothing about it and for the most part don’t give a dman.\rAm I wrong? I have had somehwere around 95 unique URLS come to my site and only one of them was a Netscraper. Sorry if it was YOU! \r\r2 Q’s-\r Is it worth the werk to get it to werk in both? \r And is there a simple way to get my site to werk inside of Netgrape? W/O much werk. \r\rAfter spending hundreds and hundreds of hours making my site, am I to spend more time getting it to werk in a browser that God has obviously cursed? Netscrape sucks and I am going to ride hard for a separate forum here, temporary, that calls for all developers to ignore Netscrape altogether and purposely leave their sites not werking in it. Because they (Netgrape) cannot do the proper werk ahead of time, pre-release, developers have to spend ,millions of extra hours because of this? Pathetic. If we can get a Netscrape ban going here, maybe Flashkit and a few others would follow suit. If that happened Netscrape would hear about it and either go bankrupt (like their browser) or they would fix their lame, loser lousy browser.\r\rWhaddya think?\rpj\r:p \rKirupa-\rI’ll try to track you down later on that issue, Thanks for your help in advance. Same with the Princess Bride, altough I did read in the forum rules that Owners are not allowed to bump sites to the top. I think Dave wrote that in… :lol:
It sounds like you hate Netscape and Netscape users enough to ignore the fact your site falls apart in it… regardless of what anyone else says. Yay or nay?
Qorry to say so Phil but I’m on Netscrape and it works fine for me…\r\rpom 0]
Rennigirl-\r Ya know I never said anything about hating Netscape users. Their browser sucks. I have hundreds of hours into this site and have no idea how long it will take to make Netscrape light up. Don’t even know how, and don’t have the time. I have so much to do, personally I think it is ridiculous. Maybe its a local thing and only my netscape doesn’t work at my site (unlikely) but I stick to my words above, I think that this is their issue, not mine, at least as far as what the browser SHOULD be able to do. And the fact they they do not spend the time in development to make their borwser compatible. But now that I have answered your Q’s Renn, how bout taking a crack at one or two of mine? And to tell you the truth, I looked over your message real hard and couldn’t find anything positive or helpful about it. As a matter of fact it has all appearances of being otherwise. \r\rPom,\r Does your Netscrape browser work at Corpus T? More than the index level? Click into the page and see what happens, I mean internal links here. If your Netscrape werks, I need to know, as this presents a whole nother mystery. www.corpust.com BTW, I am finally starting to get a foothold on how to werk the Forums which I think are pretty dandy.\r\rpj\r:p
Nope - it is not working on Netscape 4 for me. Pom might be using a newer version of Netscape. Most of basic HTML should work in Netscape and there doesn’t appear to be anything (design-wise) about your site that can’t be accomplished in Netscape. However, I’m not entirely sure how your site works (backend wise) so I’m not sure if I can really give you some pointers.\r\rIn my opinion - yes, you should make your site usable for Netscape and IE users alike. You have a wide variety of information and news that could cater to a bigger audience. It’s a potential thing. Just my dos pesos.
Hey Phil,\rI felt your pain at one time, and I gave up supporting Netscape. If there is one thing that I’ve learned, Netscape users attack in packs (kinda like the mtv-species of the ring tailed lemur). The one Netscape user who visited your site will inform through various underground channels about your site, and they will flock, spam, and roll your house into the oddest hours of the day until the site works in Netscape. So for your own benefit, and because it is a nice thing to have an information site work in Netscape as well, I would consider making the site work for the newest version of Netscape. \r\rMy best advice is for you to ensure the site looks decent in Netscape 6. Ignore Netscape 4 users. It is bad enough they use Netscape. The least they can do is use the latest version of their browser, and Netscape 6 and Netscape 7 Preview are both excellent browsers btw. If Netscape 6 was released 2 years ago, there would be no Internet Explorer browser domination.\r\rI hope that helped!\r\rCheers,\rKirupa
OK, I see what you mean. It’s a problem of MIME type, if you see what I mean, and I’m sure you don’t since even I don’t know what it means. But that’s what it is.\r\rpom 0]
Thanks Renn, Kirupa and Pom-\r Mimes hunh? Most of my files are .cfm’s if that helps anyone decipher my back end. I really didn’t know what I was doing when I started and still don’t. My thoughts are this as a possibility; The index works in Netscape, cause of the index being an .HTML. When you flop from there you go to a .cfm that only comes up as code. There was a button in Dreamweaver about Netscape compatibility, but when I punched it, it caused my site to be totally ruined (2 months ago) and am quite concerned about pressing that button again. And it didn’t work anyways. Maybe I will try with making the files .html one at a time and see if this makes the difference unless someone writes back and shouts DONT DO THAT!!! It will break the site. Or .htm. \r\rI really don’t even have a clue as to how to make this netscape compatible, or where to start. But I agree with you Kirupa that the info thing and both sets of users. However, I didn’t know that they actually had a little click where they would all gang up on my site and start problems. But it makes sense living in this world. \r\rAnd Renn, is that enough information to know what the backend is like? If memory serves me correctly, I set this up using a Cold Fuson template. Is that confirmed or denied by the .cfm file extensions? I cannot use .ASP as my server won’t support that. Other than that I am not sure what other information you would need to know the backend setup as you said. But this is why I asked. I wanted to hear people that matter (you guys & gals) and see if it was something that I needn’t worry about. But now I know, I will fix the problem somehow, somewhere, someway…Just don’t know how cause it is like being in a dark room trying to make the darkness just go away. Never works. I don’t know what .JSP is so I know I didn’t use that. \r\rThanks for your Helps everyone!\rAny more would be warmly appreciatted as I have no frelling idea what the problem is. And, I have to say it once more, I wish Netscape would get their act together. This truly is a problem of theirs, and they make their problems everyone elses by putting out these garbage browsers. But I will deal with it. Just needed to vent and blow off steam–cause this is a real pissoff.\r\rpj\r:D
hahaha, i like ur site…expose government corruption and all those horriBle AniMAl TesTiNG TheY Did ON Me…anyways, luv ur site :rollin: \r\ras far as netscape is concerned, i would have said make it compatible in netscape so i can view in school…but we switched to IE(thank God) and now i could care less about netscape :evil: \r\r:smokin: scott
Makeveli-\r\r Thanks! I hope you dont expect me to type your name the way you do, cause that would be wrong! :lol: And hard! Personally, those that did the animal testing on you are part of the American Saucer Brigade, (I put up the first forum on that last night) I will be doing a series on that in a few weeks, when time permits. Your speaking of the Men in Pink right? I would say men in black but they seem to have some sort of preoccupation with peoples butts. (anal probes galore) But if your interested I can tell you how to find one of the saucers and how to shoot it down, but you will need time, patience, a pound of C4 and one cow. When you get those things let me know if your interested and I will tell you where and how they can be found. Shooting the sucker down from that point will be the easy part.\r\rpj\r:p
All the sites we’ve produced at work are programmed under Cold Fusion. Usually we first design the site (no cfm implemented yet) test it under IE 4, Netscape 3,4,6, and Opera and under all resolutions (amen to Browser Resizer). If browser testing is done thoroughly, there isn’t any problem in the future with cross browser compatibility. After I design and test, I hand it over to the programmers and that’s it. However, sometimes we run into a couple cross browser issues when the programmers touch my designs. Usually it’s something as small as a <td> tag improperly embedded. IE is good at catching these errors and properly displaying them. Netscape punishes you by displaying it all screwy. Check your cfm files to make sure closing tags are in place. It’s possible that, for example, an if/else cfm tag is removing or placing a <td> tag when it shouldn’t. If you are using a WYSIWYG editor such as Dreamweaver - improperly embedded tags are more likely to happen.
thanks Renn! I now have something (knowledge) to help me study in the right direction, this is a good starting point. I really appreciatte it and would talk more but I haven’t slept now in about 30 hours, and think I can finally fall asleep. Insomnia last night. thanks again!\r\rpj\r:p \r\rKirupa-\rminyana please!? today didn’t work out as you can see. |I \rps: for the love of god would you delete that dolphin post? I didn’t mean to start that. And Time, its MY fault. Not yours. But Jubba was a lot right about that post.
Hey Phil,\r\rThis post a little off-topic for this thread, but I’m too lazy/busy to seek the correct one.\r\rYour site loads a lot more smoothly and quickly, plus you’ve got that clock and other signs of life so that people don’t think CT has hung. Good show. I’m also pleased to see you’ve retired those wavy flag GIFs. All in all, your site looks better, loads faster.\r\rStill some lingering problems, however.\r\rCheck your spelling. In your Genoa article, for ex., you’ve got anit-air-craft (antiaircraft). Nothing, not even cheesy design, undermines the value of a site like spelling and grammatical errors. \r\rDesign is a matter of taste; spelling and grammar are not.\r\r(some troublemakers - not specifically for you, Phil)\r\rit’s (it is)\rits (belongs to it)\ryou’re (you are)\ryour (belongs to you)\rthey’re (they are)\rtheir (belongs to them)\rthere (over yonder)\r\rAlso: check your colors; those three or four different blues you’ve got on there are not harmonious, at least to my eyes.\r\rOne final question/suggestion about your masthead. Using Flash there seems like a bit of overkill since, as far as I can tell, your masthead is static (not moving). I can’t tell the size of the swf, but in many cases of static, headline text, GIFs are smaller and hence, faster. Also, why not use a bold font, like Impact, for your Corpus Tyrannicus Research Institute signature on the masthead? What you have now is, well, wimpy. A bold, aggressive name like Corpus Tyrranicus deserves, nay begs for, a bold, agressive font. Even if you keep your masthead in Flash format, I strongly suggest getting a bolder, more dynamic font for this usage.\r\rI don’t have Netscape on this laptop anymore, so I can’t help there. \r\rFWIW\r:cool: \rsp\r\r\r\r\r
I can take all that! Excellent critique. Agreed with the colors. Did you like the brown background with the greenish menu better? Curuous. also, spelling. Right on. I noticed one last night. on the forums, conspracies. Your right again. Agreed with judgement on the buzzkill factor too. The masthead is only there to take up space. I will be making that my main menu. With as many pages as I was planning I saw that one ahead of time and figured this is a good way to change one single SWF and make a global change to every page. the drop down menus are going bye bye. Too hard to keep up with and update. nightmare actually. but i’ll come back and read the grammar part later, I am way overdue for sleep. Splinx-good to see ya and thanks for your critique. \r\rpj\r:p \rfeel free to keep going. didn’t hurt my feelings. this is the kind of stuff I wanna hear. I heard from another trusted person that the format/colors are a tad weak, needing help. And I agree. Too much blue is hard on your eyes.
i’m not a very good critiquer…but u should have a preloader on main pg. first time i came to the page i thought the only thign there was those links at the side…so maybe you could add a simple preloader to let ppl know something is loading…cuz usually status bar is not up…for me at least. whatever happened to that email u sent me…must have been intercepted by Echelon and destroyed…encrypt it this time!!\r\r:smokin: scott
Mak-\r Thats a good idea. Can I do a flash preloader for a dreamweaver HTML formatted page? If so, how. I am ignorant on this; Lemme know if you know-Thats also why I put the JS clock there, first, it shows up right away, second, it shows a clock which they can watch and time. It is 96k right now, too big, but your right, I would like to do what you described.\r\rThanks fer the input–\rpj\r:p
you guys type alot!
Sorry for butting in!!\rI just wanted to confirm that when you ask Renn for help and advice she gives it 100% I don’t think I’ve ever seen advice like that before, and then the offer to help re design it aswell \r\rAWSOME springs to mind