The New Yorker’s Sam Altman profile got an AI-style illustration that feels more unsettling than insightful, which is a neat example of why tech stories don’t automatically benefit from tech-looking art.
Here’s the illustration that kicked off the debate.
@kirupa, Yeah, this one’s fine, but “fine” still isn’t doing the article any favors, and the moment it looks AI-ish the comments turn into a “was this generated” fight instead of the actual point.
Yeah, the “AI - looking” image becomes the story and triggers skepticism that spills onto the text, so even good arguments get discounted. Original visuals like a quick sketch or your own screenshot keep attention on the substance and signal real authorship.
That “AI look” can quietly tank trust and even get your post treated like spam by platforms, so people bounce before they read. A quick phone screenshot or a simple diagram you made yourself feels like proof you did the work and keeps the focus on the writing.