Upuaut: Is there a way that you can verify that the map that i posted is ‘upside down’? Every map of DC that i have seen shows it in that orientation, and i was wondering why you seem to think that it is flipped. Care to Share?
roflmao ~ sorry man… that comment was entirely tongue in cheek. No there’s no proof that it’s upside down or right side up. Ultimatley it just matters which way you’re facing. Being that most people hold a lot of signifigance with an upsidedown pentangle, but not many know what a right side up one means, I figured I’d take the opertunity to throw it out there.
~phil says
That the new world was discovered a good long time before being ‘officially’ published; As a matter of fact an in depth study of Oak Island alone will show immedietly to the discerning, that America was discovered long before the ‘official’ 1492 proclamation by Spain;
I’m not sure if they are even still teaching that date in schools any more… but I can back it up. The “New World” had been visited by Scottish/Irish preists for hundreds of years before spain knew of it’s existance. Two American Indians crossed the Atlantic in a dugout in the 12 hundreds amazing the court of the King of Britain. The Vikings crossed regularly trading with the natives from the first century, till several hundred years later. The Ulmec heads in south american are absolutely african in inspiration implying visitation from before Christ’s birth. The Pire Ries map shows mountain ranges in Antartica which are accurate according to seismic survey. It also shows the coastling of north and south america quite accurately. This map is a reproduction of one which was held in the Library of Alexandria before it was burned to the ground.
People who studied could have learned of America’s existance a long long long time before 1492
There had been numerous voyages by ships and groups of ships to America for at least 40 years before 1492. They also produced with their intimate knowledge of the seas and coast, the maps used by Columbus to make ‘official’ this new discovery;
Yet the maps even these ‘first’ explorers’ used were not ‘new’
the maps they used showed an articulate knowledge of the Notrhern Pole and its land mass beneath, as these maps show ‘perfectly’ the hidden land beneath the Noth Pole as we know it today;
Sorry man… you have to be talking about the south pole… and are probebly referencing the “Pire Reis”. There is no land structure under the north pole.
The only way they could have thus known this was through extraordinary technology (will be discounted by most) or that they actually observed the Northern Pole without its present day ‘rim of ice’. the 2nd observation is believed to be true;
Personaly I’m a fan of the crustal slippage theory… all this one requires of the ancient people is that they have the “sextant”, and a relatively accurate time peice. Granted… to stretch the imagination to a point where one could believe that the perisan’s ancestors had a working accurate time peice is about as far a cry as believing that they saw earth from outer space.
Certainly it is an inconsitancy in our history that scientists don’t want to talk about…
None the less… I thought it was pretty common knowledge by now that the founders of America had Masonic initiates among them including B Franklin. Washington was layed out later by an entirely different person (I think he was a czech, though I can’t remmeber for sure now). None the less, massonic influences have been previlant in many of our business leaders throughout the history of this country.
perhaps the proof we have is a little sketchy… but there’s tons of it out there if one mearly takes some time to do some reading.