you are right lost… everyones’ hardware runs better in different configs…
I personally have had no probs with W2k, but I know very few people with ME that can say the same… That is the only real “quirky” OS that I have seen myself…
Rev
you are right lost… everyones’ hardware runs better in different configs…
I personally have had no probs with W2k, but I know very few people with ME that can say the same… That is the only real “quirky” OS that I have seen myself…
Rev
Yeah, I can honestly say I think winME is THE worst OS out there. I honestly have yet to know someone that runs that OS and hasn’t had problems left and right.
My brother had me over his house every other week because his computer crashed and got all screwed up and I would have to fix the problem and on many occasions that involved completely reformatting and reinstalling everything.
Same thing with a few of my friends. ME was a mistake.
well first off…
Win2K is very stable…my freshman year at school i had to dual boot Win ME and Win2k. The reason for that was because Win ME let me run programs like games, and Win2K let me do my work and hook up into all the school servers. Win ME happens to be the poorest operating system ever designed. Win2K i have never ever ever had a problem with it. It was great.
The U. of Hartford gave a copy of Win. XP Pro, and I have to say that it has exceeded most of my expectations.
Whether you use Win2K or XP Pro they are both decent operating systems.
…in my eyes…and no this isn’t to start an arguement. There are lots of things that can screw up an OS. It all depends on the work that you will be doing on your computer.
I agree.
:: Copyright KIRUPA 2024 //--