Reply to this thread to submit a site (Week 3/7-3/13)

If you wish to be considered for the SOTW for March 7-13, 2003, please read the summary of rules:

  1. Reply by Thursday, March 13 to be considered for this week’s award.

  2. Include the URL and your email address.[list=a][]Only the webmaster/creator of the site can submit.
    [
    ]Only one submission per person per week.
    [*]Submissions are capped at [COLOR=red]10 each week[/COLOR], so don’t wait or hesitate until the last minute.
    [/list=a]

  3. Websites submitted must be at least 90% Flash. Sites that have HTML pages with a Flash intro are ineligible.

  4. While it is understood that sites are perpetually under construction, please submit only complete sites. Do not submit a site that is less than 80% finished.

  5. Submissions must be actual websites with sections and content. Examples of ineligible include (but not limited to) flash games, movies, etc.

  6. There will be a private poll among the moderators and a winner will be announced by Tuesday, March 18, 2003.

  7. No critiques or feedback is allowed in the submission thread. If you wish a concentrated critique of your site, you may start a thread in Site Check.

For more information or questions, please refer to the Official SOTW Rules. Once you have read and understand the rules above, you may submit your site to this thread. Sites not adhering to the rules above will be disqualified and deleted. Submitting your site is an agreement and acceptance of the rules.

[COLOR=red]Side Note:[/COLOR]: Kirupa has recently switched servers, causing us to lose quite a few submissions. I have manually added your submissions below.

*Originally posted by comicGeek *
**Here I go again on my submission:

KELdesigns V2.3

comicGeek

I hope this time I’ll make it. :stuck_out_tongue: **

*Originally posted by raphidae *
**MediaMonks **

*Originally posted by webshocker *
**http://www.webshocker.net **

*Originally posted by timhlu *
**Hi,

Lu Studios:
http://www.lustudios.com/

[email protected]

Tim **

UNFLUX

bryan AT unflux.com

/unflux
:goatee:

Hi…
I have a new site :

www.ajitmenon.com

Thx
Ajit

http://www.thehospital.intrinsicmediainc.com

[email protected]

And if I don’t win, I’ll redesign again

http://www.yoyomhz.com

The flash movie on the very first page is 33KB, btw.

This is my submission
some comments please

Guru Sports

Tks and Big up to kirupa

Thanks very much for being so dedicated RenaissanceGirl. :slight_smile:

Keep up the good work!

:flower:

i guess i’ll try mine:

The Tone Lab
My Email

:love:

:slight_smile: Thanks ComicGeek for your kind words.

[COLOR=red]Maximum submissions reached; thread closed[/COLOR]

The results are in:

comicGeek 15.38%
raphidae 38.46%
webshocker 7.69%
timhlu 0%
UNFLUX 23.08%
ajitmenon 0%
xmattx 0%
yoyomhz 0%
liquidac 0%
violet 15.38%

The winner is RAPHIDAE!

Congratulations raphidae. You may also post a graphical award from this page: http://www.kirupa.com/gallery/awards.asp.

Good job to all the participants. Check back later as mod critiques will be posted later today.

Very nice work everyone. It was one of the best weeks ever. I sure hope that those you didn’t win will resubmit soon :slight_smile:

**** **** **** me!!

im glad that site wasn’t in last week…

:m:

patiently waiting

Sorry kids… Rengirl went on an impromptu 2-day getaway but now that she’s back… here are the critiques. Also: take note of the “general comments” below.

comicGeek

Very clean design and layout, transitions and effects are smooth. The text on the orange was a bit harsh on my eyes, but it wasn’t too major.


Nice and clean, everything looks good (although the orange/grey combination is a bit tired) and loads fast. It’s a good site.

nice, 2nd place…wait a while before submitting again…

I really, really like the look and pheel of this site; The layout is incredibly clean, pro design, nice loads. My only suggestion to his site is to do away with the little bouncing smilies. they detract from an otherwise outstanding site. I love the way his pictures load, I love the detail given to this site; Theres little doubt in my mind how this made it to SOTW. and in spite of the bouncing smilies, I am casting my vote for this site this week. One of the things that won me over was the free download of the source philes. Remove the bouncing smilies, and in my opinion there is no doubt as to the winnability of this site. My vote goes to comic geek, a hard pressed decision, as there were many others this week that were nearly just as good in my mind.

comic geek got my vote… all in all, Comic Geek executed all of the points I want to see in a website, including fun and smooooooothness points…

I critiqued this last time it was entered, so everything still goes. I thought it was great. I love the layout and design. And it ran smooth for me.

Good: usable, well-designed, cute eggs. Not so good: bouncing eggs seem a little out of place… don’t fit into environment, it might be that the pastel colors don’t suit the stronger orange and greys.

raphidae

The graphics on this site is very clean and the music is catchy. At first glance, I didn’t like the horizontal scrollbar, but after I clicked on the menu, I noticed that it has a horizontal sliding effect similar on Lost’s site. The downside to this site is with the text, some of the pixel fonts are a bit hard to read.


Very original work! I love the pixel art.

original layout, section titles/headers not visible enuff, lacks color, contact form: at least select the text, or better empty the fields onSetFocus!! 3rd place ex-aqueo

Another fantastic entry. No question again how this made it to SOTW. This week or soon enough, this site will win. The effects are awesome. Great transitions, great color, great use of the screen area. Perhaps another font would do better, but it looks great as it is. The load times are excessive, and took a considerable amount of time on my wireless high speed connection; I wonder how they might fare with a 56k. But forgiveness comes when the load times are rewarded by such a rich, easy to use interface…

didn’t like the horiz navigation…

I noticed that some of this is HTML. I almost took that into consideration, but then I noticed that all of your main content is indeed Flash. So that makes up for it. If I may make one suggestion though, hide the scrollbar if you are going to do this sliding thing. I didn’t know the sliding thing at first and I would drag the bar then click on a navigation button and so your page would jump around, and this caused some lagging because my system had to catch up. I do love the layout and design, and the pixel art is excellent. Could use just a little more color though. For some reason it reminds me a lot of http://www.drububu.com/

Good: clever animations, entertaining, well-designed. Not so good: what’s with the biological charts and illustrations?

webshocker

Like comicGeek’s site, this one had an orange background with black text as well, but it was less harsh on the eyes because the solid orange is concentrated into one area and the rest is transparent. I like the transitions on this site, but I think it would also be nice to have a preloader displaying some kind of progress either in percentages or a loading bar.


Nice design agency site, everything’s well done. But nothing really exciting here, we’ve all seen this 10 times…

why is the “enter” btn not a button? why do minimized windows disappear when going to another section, makes a good idea useless! what’s the button next to min/close in the windows titlebar for? clean, nice, good logo, 1st place.

I like the basic layout, but do not like the use of popups as a normal transition. Personally I hate sites that do this. I am always wondering what this little popup will be, and despise their use, but then thats me. The colors are good, but the transitions are a bit choppy. I can tell by his work he can do better than this in his transitions. I like his custom movie loader and viwer, that was great. His movies were cute and quite original, a highlight of the site. While it is well done, it is not extrordinary. I can tell by the skills they show, they have the capability to do much better…

once I figured out enter wasn’t enter… nice site

The window blur-ins were obviously low quality imported images or some sort. I wasn’t too fond of how pixelated it looked. I don’t see any point to having a draggable pop up window to house your content. You barely have any space to drag it, and your information could have easily been incorporated into your layout without the draggable.minimizable/closeable pop up window. I thought your section transitions were nice though, and the color scheme is pretty nice as well. Interested effect having a mouse shadow as well. Although it tended to follow my mouse not so smoothly.

Good: cleanly executed design and user-friendly interface. Not so good: splash page… I keep clicking on “Enter” and nothing happens.

timhlu

There isn’t much to say about this site, with the competition it’s going against, it has no chance of winning. The design is simple, but the text is blurry so it no longer has that professional feel like the other sites.


Nice little site. The design is pretty good, even though the snow might be a little bit out of place. Nothing fancy, but nicely done (except the font). It’s funny, I remember when you posted the Apollo 11 site on this forum… a loooong time ago.

too small, too empty, no contact form, it’s in a pop-up, no need to use flash for this site! 7th place

This is a pretty basic generic site; Although I can see from some of his earlier sites, things I would absolutely love to see tutorials for on Kirupa, like the color pad, and I also liked the Appolo 13 werk. This site lacks any umph or depth to make it SOTW. I would like to see them enlarge these ideas, skip the popups, and try a main interface thats more interesting.

why a popup? text is real blurry

Nice little layout, and nice colors, but with the competition the outlook isn’t too good. Your navigation text is small and blurry and your standard text seems to be blurry too. Also, your loop seemed to shut off on me after a certain amount of times looping. Perhaps this is just me, I don’t know. It only happened to me once or twice.

Good: simple, well-designed. Not so good: I don’t feel that flash was used to its full potential here.

UNFLUX

Like raphidae’s site, this site uses pixel fonts as well, but it was easier to read since the text are in laid out in blocks or chunks so the viewers eyes remains stable and is able to concentrate on one area at a time. I love the color scheme and the graphics on this site, very clean.


Neato. It’s fast, colorful, very clean, I like it.

hate the colors!! blue, yellow, grey…?! the contact form’s submit button provides NO FEEDBACK. still nice design… 6th place

Another great site as well. I hope I do not sound overly critical here, but it is a peeve. We have all this space; We pay extra for larger monitors so we can see the screen better. And almost every new flash site ignores this great capacity of space. The only thing I don’t like about Unflux’s site is the incredibly small buttons. And again it is a personal peeve but worth mentioning because it’s so important; Make buttons large and easy to get to, click on, etc…There are people with seeing disabilities, arthritis, and many other things that make it hard to scroll around with a mouse, and lose patience when web designers ingnore open space and opt for hard to buttons; I am picking on Unflux as I think he can take it if this is copied publicly. His site is outstanding, superb, excellent, except for this, my faupau…I hope all the web designers out there decide to take up that option of space and use it wisely and inclusively, as it is such a terrible waste…Unflux’s site will in my opinion become SOTW material someday, just not this week.

transitions tended to be lengthy by the end of the visit.

I love the layout, the colors, the images, the transitions. Call me a dope, but I just love this site. I love the minimalistic style.

Good: excellent use of space, color and typography. I believe this is a good example of a 2advanced-inspired site. It doesn’t copy or imitate… but I can see some influence. But there is definitely still some originality to it. Not so good: can’t really think of anything…

ajitmenon

It was a tough decision for me since I liked this site as well since it’s different from the others, it has this dark gothic feel to it and the classical music is a nice touch to the theme. What killed it for me was the blurry text, I would of expected someone who could pull off a site like this to be able to correct the blurry text problem, but I guess they didn’t want to bother with it… What a shame…


Nice site. I like the mysterious look, with that thing that sort of follows the mouse. The text of the menu is a bit hard to read though, that’s too bad. The portfolio is nice, but a bit empty.

pop-up…! change the texts in the works section, they all start with “this section features a lot of…” (specially for the still empty one…!!) nice layout, poetic feeling… why 2 btns: about > contact if there’s just the contact form there…? 4th place

To be honest, I lost patience with this site; nice background music, an eventual nice interface if you can figure out that it’s loading or not…Small hard to get to buttons. But excellent work. the skills exhibited are excellent; But the design is lacking in these basic elemements: 1. If somethings loading and Im supposed to wait; Tell me, and show me, or else I think I am dealing with an incomplete site; 2. The buttons are overly small; What if the elderly start coming to your site in droves and complain about the hard to get to buttons…Will you change them? Buttons do not have to be small to be impressive or attractive. Just something to remember. 3. The interface is superb; but delivery is poor. Too slow. Load bars or something need to be added;

why a popup? blurry text, lags seriously on my comp.

I have to say, the design of this is great. The vector is awesome, and the feel of it rocks. But that text almost killed my eyes. It was so small and blurry I found myself squinting to read. That was the only real major downfall I could find here.

Good: fairly original navigation system. Not so good: the popup that doesn’t fit in an 800x600 is unnecessary and there is no apparent way to turn of the music.

xmattx

Honestly, I didn’t like this site at all, the color scheme reminded me of Christmas and there’s too much negative space since there’s little content. I think the layout would be better if it was smaller and with a different color scheme…


Cool design! I like the red/weird blue combination. The menu is very nice too. Too bad that all we get on the site is a scroller and some text…

why flash? no sound, no images, no multimedia…? why is the left part completely empty? the grey navigation items don’t show enuff, look like text… 6th place ex-aqueo

Everything works fine and has a quick transition, but there isn’t much to this site; Its a shell of what someone with basic skills could produce in a day or two. No upmph, no awe. Not much here. Shouldn’t have been submitted to SOTW in light of the entries lately submitted. They need to garner more experience, but seem to be on the right road…

looks like a good start… needs something on the left.

There is a such thing as being TOO minimalistic. I love hte minimalistic look, but there is so much empty space on your site, the only part of your layout that actually got any use besides the navigation is a small white column, and all that had was some text and an up and down button. The text in there just changed with each section. I like the color scheme, and what you have of the layout so far, just think it needs more.

Good: fast loading. Not so good: usability issues… the menu competes with a busy repeating background and other noisier surroundings - it should be the other way around. The site also makes no use of Flash’s features… it would be better served as an HTML page.

yoyomhz

I remember this site, he or she didn’t even bother to do any changes since the last time I critiqued it so I’m not going to even bother commenting on it now.


I think I’ve seen this site already. It slows down my computer (the rollovers especially), and the first button I clicked opened a pop-up…

no direct links from section to section, design to squareish, btn anims much too long (it’s just buttons…!) 8th & last place

Basic site, fairly well done. Shows mastery of basic flash skills and basic navigation; Color scheme, fairly good. Not bad. But not SOTW material, IMO. Not yet. Let them add something like some scifi.com effect to their site, or something. Kind of plain and basic, yet good and well done…

I’ve critiqued before, saw nothing new.

Nothing has changed that I noticed from that last time it was entered and critiqued. In my honest opinion, I don’t think this is SOTW material.

Good: it’s a good start for a newbie site. Not so good: no improvements since last time. Nice animations but this site appears to be in it’s very beginning stages. For one thing, a lot of work needs to be done to improve the structure. The splash page: the animated banners are very distracting and the whole page just looks hap-hazardly thrown together. Also there seems to be very little design unity between the sections. Sweety, please don’t take this the wrong way but you are a long, long way from being a good candidate for this award. You don’t seem to have a very good grasp of Flash, which is okay… but this award is for superior Flashers. It is not a newbie award that we hand out to just anybody who applies.

liquidac

Another fine example of a site well designed, but has blurry text problems. Blurry text shouldn’t be ignored and it kills the overall look of the site.


Nice site ( and in French ), with nice colors and all, but it remains very simple.

it’s in French: +100points, hehe… but i thought canadian stuff had to be in both english and french? no option to switch language?! lack of color… 5th position

I apologize, but perhaps since it was in another language it was harder to follow along. Too basic to even consider for SOTW. It is outclassed. Perhaps another week? I am not sure it qualifies, considering the competition.

the text is too blurry to read… and I’m guessing that info is important

Another 2A copy menu. Your text was also small and blurry. I do like the fact that your music is off by default and you can turn it on if you want. I think it could use some transitions. The blinking everywhere while things load isn’t very eye pleasing.

Good: it’s in a different language but it’s still usable. Not so good: it’s just lukewarm. It’s doesn’t really showcase some really good flash skills or creativity.

violet

UNFLUX and violet were neck to neck for me, but in the end I decided to go for violet because I like the color scheme more. I wish I could vote for both sites, but I could only choose one. Congrats violet, you get my vote this time.


great site, very nice graphics, I don’t like the hidden menu so much, but everything looks very good. That scrolling container thing is deja-vu though…

nice design, simple, clean don’t hide the menu items!! ugly contact form! 3rd place

Now here is a site and artist with some promise for SOTW. Just not yet. The navigation was hard to see or find. Clever, but hard to notice. It needs to be more obvious. Color scheme is impeccable. Effects are excellent, although I would like to see them larger. Poor font usage. Hard to read to me, so I didn’t read much, to be honest. The text in the scrollbars I speak of specifically. The interface itself is ingenious and really cool, great effect, and wonderfully done, right down to the sounds. This is similar to how i would like my own site to look. great stuff, but it doesn’t get my vote just yet…

it is hard for me to get into this style of site… heck, I didn’t like EG’s either…

I love it. I also dislike the hidden menu though. That side scrolling thing does seem to be becoming overused lately though. I think in your layout it works good anyway.

Good: nice, clean graphics. Not so good: it’s just lukewarm… I don’t know what else to say about it. It didn’t particularly blow up my skirt or anything.

general comments

First a general critic for half of the sites submitted!!:

Please disable the menu button for the current section!!
applies to comicG, rapidae, timhlu, unflux, liquidae…

Believe it or not I voted for Comic geek this week; Mediamonks was wonderful and it was a tossup between these two. But the coin toss went to Comic Geek. Excellent site, excellent design, color schem, usability, easy to use interface, and on and on, yada, yada. Lose the bouncing smilies ASAP. Other than that, it gets my vote for SOTW.

I liked overall the color scheme, navigation and control phactor better in comic geek’s site better-

I voted UNFLUX. It was an incredibly touch choice between Unflux, Violet, rapihidae, and comicGeek. But after long thought, I decided to go with Unflux. I hope they resubmit again!

For now, I’ll just post a vote. It was a choice between four for me really, but eventually I have gone for Media Monks.

Comic Geek almost had it, and I really liked Unflex as well, but Media Monks just squeezed it for me. I even liked the preloader, which is saying something.

**** what a tough choice. I went with Unflux this time. I was torn between Unflux, comicGeek and raphidae. Ditto - I, too, am a fan of the minimalistic approach. I disagree about his need to use more space. A lot of people still use a screen resolution of 800x600 (including myself, if you count that I size down my browsers that way to make better use of my screen real estate). Using any more of that space would have make the site too noisy (as with every other flash site). Anyway, I find Unflux to be well balanced.