WARNING to all females

or perhaps hear this warning?

Anyone else notice that any thread involving females usually get a lot of traffic?

I meant here at KirupaForums, but yes, I guess I may be here to hear this warning. Thank you all for warning me, I’ll be on my way now. :smiley:

[size=3][font=Times New Roman]

:h:[font=Verdana][size=2] [/size][/font]What does that even mean?? Is that like, guy speak or something? Keen on what?
[/font][/size]
[size=3][font=Times New Roman][/font][/size]
[size=3][font=Times New Roman]Ok well that’s just asking for a blonde joke… :h:[/font][font=Verdana][size=2] [/size][/font][/size]

[font=Times New Roman][size=3]There is no way you haven’t heard that expression before……[/size][/font]

[font=Times New Roman][size=3]Like nice guys finish last ![/size][/font]

[font=Times New Roman][size=3]Didn’t you ever see the episode of Seinfeld where George plays the bad boy ![/size][/font]

I’m a Math/CS major

Cool… I want to be a Counter Strike major too… :smiley:

I’ll take your word for it. I don’t watch much TV at all. :stuck_out_tongue:

nice guys finish last !

Ha ha ha… I just realised there are two meanings for that…

I never thought of the MA+ one before… :slight_smile:

LOL

Holy cow I go away for like, what, 12 hours and this thread, which started out with a REALLY OLD AND VERY LAME JOKE (sorry Vulcan :beam: ) and now its FOUR pages long???

Okay, well, whatever, here ya go:


Dear Tech Support,

Last year I upgraded from Girlfriend 7.0 to Wife 1.0. I soon noticed that the new program began unexpected child processing that took up a lot of space and valuable resources. No mention of this was included with the product information.

In addition, Wife 1.0 installed itself into all other programs and now launches during system initialization, where it monitors all other system activity. Applications such as Poker Night 10.3, Drunken Boys Night 2.5, Football 5.0, Hunting and Fishing 7.5 and Racing 3.6 no longer run, crashing the system whenever selected.

I can't seem to keep Wife 1.0 in the background while attempting to run my favorite applications. I'm thinking about going back to Girlfriend 7.0, but the Uninstall doesn't work on Wife 1.0. Please help!

Thanks,

Signed,
A Troubled User


Dear Troubled User,

This is a very common problem. Many people upgrade from Girlfriend 7.0 to Wife 1.0 thinking that it is merely an Utilities and Entertainment program. Wife 1.0 is an OPERATING SYSTEM and is designed by its creator to run everything! It is also impossible to delete Wife 1.0 and return to Girlfriend 7.0. Hidden operating system files cause Girlfriend 7.0 to emulate Wife 1.0 so nothing is gained.

It is impossible to uninstall, delete, or purge the program files from the system once installed. You cannot go back to Girlfriend 7.0 because Wife 1.0 is designed to not allow this. Some have tried to install Girlfriend 8.0 or Wife 2.0 but end up with more problems than in the original system. Look in your Wife 1.0 manual under "Warnings: Maintenance/Child Support".

I recommend that you keep Wife 1.0. I suggest installing the background application program Yes_Dear to alleviate software augmentation. Having installed Wife 1.0 myself, I also suggest that you read the entire section regarding "General Partnership Faults (GPFs)".

You must assume all responsibility for any faults and problems that occur, regardless of their cause. You will also find that GPFs tend to be somewhat cyclical, occurring approximately 28 days apart. The best course of action is to enter the command C:APOLOGIZE. Avoid excessive use of C:YES_DEAR because ultimately you will have to use the APOLOGIZE command before the system will return to normal anyway.

Remember, the system will run smoothly as long as you take the blame for all GPFs. Wife 1.0 is a great program, but tends to require very high maintenance. Wife 1.0 comes with several support programs such as Clean_and_Sweep 3.0, Cook_It 1.5 (which replaces Burn_It 1.0) and Do_Bills 4.2. You must however be very careful how you use these programs. Improper use will cause the system to launch the program Nag_Nag 9.5. Once this happens, the only way to improve the performance of Wife 1.0 is to purchase additional software. I recommend Flowers 2.1 and Diamonds 5.0 should this happen.

Best of luck.
Tech Support

Darn straight. :evil:

You’ve now met (at leat virtually) a female programmer.

I know ActionScript, HTML, JavaScript, Visual Basic,C, C++, Pascal, COBOL, Java, plus one or two other odds and ends. I also did my BSc Honours degree in Computer Science. I also draw. :slight_smile:

Now THAT is an understatement.

[SIZE=-4]Go get 'em Kit![/SIZE] :beam:

You will also find that GPFs tend to be somewhat cyclical, occurring approximately 28 days apart.

Ha ha ha I think this just about sums it up !

Kitiara: See, they don’t breed women like you in the states. All who fit your qualifications are usually put in shipping containers after birth and sent to the UK or AU, so much that us geeks remain a small minority in the population. Probobly some sort of government conspiracy. Even Canada has lots of geek girls (My mom is still a Canadian citizen, so if Kerry gets elected, I can get out of here). If you happen to be a geek girl in the states, lay low. You never know who is going to want to ship you “down under”. :wink:

well, i didnt find that one as funny as the first… :frowning:

well, i didnt find that one funny.

No - see, they do. But they look like men…or Roseanne. That’s why you haven’t noticed them :slight_smile: If you ever come to Boston when school is in session, we can play the “guess their gender” game at MIT.

[size=1]EDIT: I’m joking btw. There are a lot of nice, intelligent female types. You just have to chill at Best Buy, LAN Parties, and book stores to see them.[/size]

See kirupa, I’m not sure I consider Roseanne to be a woman.

wom·an ( P ) Pronunciation Key (wmn)
n. pl. wom·en (wmn)

  1. An adult female human.
  2. Women considered as a group; womankind: “Woman feels the invidious distinctions of sex exactly as the black man does those of color” (Elizabeth Cady Stanton).
  3. An adult female human belonging to a specified occupation, group, nationality, or other category. Often used in combination: an Englishwoman; congresswoman; a saleswoman.
  4. **Posessing Feminine quality or aspect; womanliness. **
  5. A female servant or subordinate.

Perhaps, under the first definition, she could be considered a “woman”, but I’d just call her a “female”. Personally, I tend to side with that fourth definition… :wink:

edit: LOL. I’d imagine that “guess the gender” game might be popular at NASCAR events aswell… :smiley: But I’d definitly be down to play it sometime. Boston rules. I almost went to BU, but decided to stay here in AZ to save some money, and not pay off student loans till I was 30. (and party :beer: )

hah this is cool :beer:

Well there’s one install that nobody has bothered use,

its called Raydred 1.0
and its in a managed “Sandbox” like environment , so it won’t crash =)
hehe

Raydred, your hawaiian shirt and wrap around glasses are mesmirizing me.

The GOGGLES!!! THEY DO NOTHING!!!